Nonfics

Nonfics

'The Art Of The Steal' Review

In this edition of Cinematical’s Doc Talk column, we look at Don Argott’s ‘The Art of the Steal’ and other art world documentaries.

Christopher Campbell's avatar
Christopher Campbell
Feb 24, 2010
∙ Paid

Who determines what is fine art and what is not? Why does it matter who painted a particular piece? Are museums like zoos for inanimate objects? These questions and others have been asked or are inspired by recent documentaries about the art world, including Don Argott's The Art of the Steal, which opens this weekend in theaters and debuts today on IFC On Demand.

If you've ever been interested in art -- or, if you've at least been to an art museum before (who hasn't?) -- please do yourself a favor and check this new film out. Then come back here and contribute to the Doc Talk discussion. Other films I recommend seeing are My Kid Could Paint That and Who the #$&% is Jackson Pollock?, both of which have altered my perception of fine art and the art world from what I grew up with.

From birth, I was raised on galleries, museums, and art lessons. I come from a family of artistic individuals, both professional and non-professional. And my schoolmates consistently labeled me "Class Artist." Yet the whole topic of art has always been tricky for me. I've consistently had conflicting views on art, hated theory and pretentious art world B.S., and I never felt the need to defend, critically, why my favorite painters are as disparate as Van Gogh, Miro, Parrish, my brother, and Bierstadt.

Nonfics is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

I had as much interest in commercial illustration (including, of course, a love for movie poster design), the kind my father made a living at, as the works of the masters. Meanwhile, I always found the idea of standing in line for hours to see the Mona Lisa, just because it's the Mona Lisa, to be pretty lame. Nothing against the academic art world, really (I do cherish what art history education I've had), but I don't like how it dictates to the masses -- part of this being the fault of the masses, I know -- what is important and valuable art (and certainly the same can be said for cinema).

But I'm getting beside the point. My personal exposure to and attitude towards art (specific works, the concept of art, the branding of art, whatever) is not important. All I mean to do is point out my background before admitting that despite my cultured and contemplative existence, I still never really pondered some of the most interesting issues about art, which are raised by the documentaries I mention above -- and boy do I love a film that makes me completely rethink a topic or issue -- and I doubt most basic and casual art appreciators have either.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Christopher Campbell.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Christopher Campbell · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture